Is that Star Trek character a womanizer: Opinions by me
- Prime!Kirk: No. He is in love with the people he sleeps with, he's just an idiot who thinks you can fall in love in 3 hours
- Riker: No. Yes, he fucks around a lot, but "womanizer" to me implies objectification, and Will may be a slut, but he is respectful of all of his partners
- Quark: Yes, and he is disgusting on top of it, but he does get sympathy points for being a repressed bottom from a society that says being a bottom is wrong
- Bashir: Yes. He is my favorite character, so I would like to say no, or that it depends on the season, or that he's got the Kirk mentality of thinking he can be in love in a matter of hours. But unfortunately, the way he treats both of the Daxes outweighs this and I'm forced to condemn him
- Jadzia: No. Same as Will; she fucks around but is very respectful
- Paris: Yes. While I do think it depends on who is writing him and it does fluctuate whether or not he is, he leaves you with the overall impression of a womanizer
- Tucker: No. "Womanizer" implies being successful with women
- Archer: No. Same reasons as Tucker. He is a fuckboi tho
- Reed: No. He's a homosexual no matter how cowardly the writers are
- Kelvin!Kirk: Yes. It's gross, but he at least seems to have developed a taste for respect women juice by Beyond
- Mirror!Georgiou: Yes. But I feel like the whole eating people thing is a bigger issue
- Star Trek Picard had too much plot and not enough character, so I don't even know who could be the candidate for them
